The State of Andhra Pradesh v. M/s Pearl Beverages Limited,
TREVC/21/2022 · 2025-02-05
B Krishna Mohan, Nyapathy Vijay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14539 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14539 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010180532019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TAX REVISION CASE NO: 21/2022 Between: The State Of Andhra Pradesh M/s Pearl Beverages Limited Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX (AP) Counsel for the Respondent:
1. A SARVESWAR RAO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY TAX REVISION CASE NO: 21/2022
The State Of Andhra Pradesh AND M/s Pearl Beverages Limited ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:
GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX (AP) Counsel for the Respondent:
A SARVESWAR RAO IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3516] FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT
2 HBKM,J & HVN,J
TREVC.No.21 of 2022
The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan)
Heard the learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.
2. This tax revision case arises against the common order passed by the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam in T.A.No.39 of 2009 and batch, dated 09.01.2019 by remanding the matter to the assessing authority to pass orders afresh, as indicated in the said order.
3. Though the disputed tax is shown as Rs.18,41,515/- (Denial of ITC) in this case, as there is no question of law to be interfered with and as we do not see infirmity in the order passed by the Tribunal below, we see no reason to interfere with the same.
4. Hence, the Tax Revision Case is dismissed. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 05.02.2025 MDP