PASUPULETI RAMESH BABU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/4030/2025 · 2025-04-16
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14537 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14537 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010180482025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4030/2025 Between: Pasupuleti Ramesh Babu ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. SRAVAN KUMAR NAIDANA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order:
The petitioner is arrayed as accused in Crime No.49 of 2025, on the file of Madakasira Police Station, Sri Satya Sai district, for alleged offence under Section 196(1) of BNS.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
3. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner filed this petition seeking the quashing of the FIR, he has, however, restricted the relief to the
2
extent of directing the Investigating Officer to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 35(3) of the BNSS, and the guidelines prescribed by the Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar1.
4. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor stated that he has no objection to give such a direction.
5. The criminal petition is disposed of by directing the Station House Officer, Madakasira Police Station, Srikakulam district, to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “BNSS”) in so far as the petitioner is concerned.
6. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated : 16.04.2025 BMS
1 (2014) 8 SCC 273