Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14536 (CHH)

LOKESH KUNJAM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2561/2023 · 2025-09-03

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:45422 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2561 of 2023 1 - Lokesh Kunjam S/o Ramesh Kunjam Aged About 27 Years R/o Village- Tekmatala, Teh- Usur, District- Bijapur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Santosh Sodi S/o Mutta Sodi Aged About 30 Years R/o Village- Murdanda, Teh- Usur, District- Bijapur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Ankati Sodi D/o Potraj Sodi Aged About 34 Years R/o Village- Perampalli, Teh- Usur, District- Bijapur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, Directorate of Public Instruction Department of School Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Block- C, 1st Floor, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Education Officer, Raipur District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : None For State/Respondents : Mr. Ajay Pandey, Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 04.09.2025 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition even in two rounds. 2. Mr. Ajay Pandey, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State/respondents, is present. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.09.04 18:49:31 +0530 2 3. Today, when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioners is not present nor any representation made on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition on repeated calls and it appears that the petitioners have lost interest in pursuing the matter, as such this Court has left with no other option, but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh