Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14535 (KAR)

SMT SHOBHA v. THAHASILDAR

WP/2659/2025 · 2025-04-24

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16777 WP No. 2659 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 2659 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHOBHA W/O LATE SHESHAGIR ACHAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 2. D.S. CHETHAN S/O LATE SHESHAGIRI ACHAR AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT DIBBURU VILLAGE HESARAGATTA HOBLI YELAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU NORTH-560 064. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SOMASHEKAR C. ANGADI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THAHASILDAR DEVANAHALLI TALUKU DEVANAHALLI-562 110. 2. DEPUTY TAHASILDAR JALA 1 YELAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU NORTH-560 064. 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16777 WP No. 2659 of 2025 BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SHIVA REDDY, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 29.08.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-E IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The prayer in this writ petition is to direct respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 29.08.2024 by which the petitioners contends that their grandfather Bhadrachar was granted 2 acres and 20 guntas of land in old Sy.No.79 and new Sy.No.80 and a saguvali chit had also been issued in his favour. 2. It is stated in the said representation that the grantee Bhadrachar is no more and his son has also passed away. The petitioners therefore contends that - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16777 WP No. 2659 of 2025 they are entitled to have their name entered on the basis of the grant said to have been made in favor of their grandfather. 3. It is also stated that the grandson of Bhadrachar has also passed away and the petitioner being his wife is entitled to get her name entered in the revenue records on the basis of the grant alleged to have been made in favor of Bhadrachar. 4. In the light of the fact that the petitioners claims that the land in question had been granted to Bhadrachar, the Tahsildar is directed to examine the records, ascertain whether the assertions made in the petition are correct, and then consider the request of the petitioners for getting the name entered in the revenue records in accordance with law within a period of three months. 5. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:16777 WP No. 2659 of 2025 6. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5