Sri. Gunnam Sathish, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/9249/2024 · 2025-06-26
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14534 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14534 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010181202024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9249/2024 Between: Sri. Gunnam Sathish, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2
The Court made the following Order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents-police in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 28.03.2023.
2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for respondents 1 to 3, submits that, post reorganization of districts, the Station House Officer is Ananthagiri Police Station would not have jurisdiction.
3. Considering the same, it is left open for the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the concerned Station House Officer and on receipt of such representation, the same shall be considered in accordance with law as per the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, (for short, “BNSS”).
4. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
5. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Date : 27.06.2025 BMS