156 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA JARNAIL SINGH ANIL MALIK AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Mr. Manish Dadwal, AA HARKESH MANUJA Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Sushil Mangla, BDPO Shahzadpur submits that though no speaking orders have been passed, however, the petitioners have not been found entitled for allotment of 100 square yards plots. In such circumstances, the respondents are directed to afford opportunity of hearing to the petitioner am in the office of BDPO, Shahzadpur and the Committee shall offer hearing to the petitioners and pass separate speaking orders with respect to the petitioners on their claim towards 100 square yards plots. counsel further assures that the speaking orders shall be passed within a period of two weeks of the date of hearing and a c furnished to the petitioner within one week thereafter. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/ as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 19.02.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: Februa JARNAIL SINGH AND ORS Versus ANIL MALIK AND ORS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Sushil Mangla, BDPO Shahzadpur submits that though no speaking orders have been passed, however, the petitioners have not been found entitled for allotment of 100 square yards plots. In such circumstances, the respondents are directed to afford opportunity of hearing to the petitioners on Monday i.e. 24.02.2025 at 11:00 am in the office of BDPO, Shahzadpur and the Committee shall offer hearing ners and pass separate speaking orders with respect to the petitioners on their claim towards 100 square yards plots. further assures that the speaking orders shall be passed within a period of two weeks of the date of hearing and a c furnished to the petitioner within one week thereafter. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/ costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-5058-2024 Date of Decision: February 19, 2025 .......Petitioners ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. G, Haryana. Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Sushil Mangla, BDPO Shahzadpur submits that though no speaking orders have been passed, however, the petitioners have not been found entitled for allotment of In such circumstances, the respondents are directed to afford on Monday i.e. 24.02.2025 at 11:00 am in the office of BDPO, Shahzadpur and the Committee shall offer hearing ners and pass separate speaking orders with respect to the petitioners on their claim towards 100 square yards plots. Learned State further assures that the speaking orders shall be passed within a period of two weeks of the date of hearing and a copy thereof shall be furnished to the petitioner within one week thereafter. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioners does However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioners would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/- costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioners towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2024 ry 19, 2025 Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Sushil Mangla, BDPO Shahzadpur submits that though no speaking orders have been passed, however, the petitioners have not been found entitled for allotment of In such circumstances, the respondents are directed to afford on Monday i.e. 24.02.2025 at 11:00 am in the office of BDPO, Shahzadpur and the Committee shall offer hearing ners and pass separate speaking orders with respect to the Learned State further assures that the speaking orders shall be passed within a shall be does is not done within the would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the - towards litigation TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.02.21 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document