IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3345 of 2024 ------ 1. Mohiuddin Ansari, aged about 62 years, s/o late Lal Mohammad Miyan 2. Hafiz Ansari, aged about 52 years, s/o late Kabir Mohammad 3. Nabi Husain @ Nabi Hussain, aged about 40 years, s/o late Kabir Mohammad All resident of Village-Nawadih, P.O.-Panki, P.S.-Panki, Dist.-Palamau, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Spl. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Ayush Kr. Verma, Advocate ------ Order No.08 Dated- 30.01.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Panki P.S. Case No.33 of 2024 registered under sections 147/148/n 149/341/323/325/307 of the Indian Penal Code. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were members of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly attempted to murder the father of the informant namely Hazrat Mian. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the alleged injury sustained, was by hard and blunt object. It is then submitted that the petitioners had no intention to kill anybody and they have falsely been implicated in this case only to extort money from them. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant, victims or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 20,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Palamu, in connection with Panki P.S. Case No.33 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the informant, victims or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-