NARGIS HILAL AND ANR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME DEPARTMENT)
WP(C)/1598/2023 · 2025-12-19
Sanjeev Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14532 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14532 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.15 SUPPL. CAUSE LIST-I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1598/2023 CM(3716/2023) Nargis Hilal and Anr. …Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs. Union Territory of J&K & Ors.
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG with Ms. Maha Majeed, Assisting Counsel
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER 19.12.2025
1. Vide order dated 26th June, 2023, when the learned counsel for the petitioners was also present, this writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the official respondents to provide security to the petitioner and act in accordance with law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. (2006) 5 SCC 475, and Shakti Vahini Vs. Union of India and Ors. AIR 2018 SC 1601”.
2. It seems that inadvertently another order dated 26th June, 2023 came to be passed wherein the matter was adjourned and directed to be listed before the Vacation Judge.
MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 23.12.25
3. Be that as it may, the order dated 26th June, 2023, whereby the case was adjourned has been passed inadvertently and needs to be recalled. Ordered accordingly.
4. In view of the aforesaid, this petition shall be deemed to have been disposed of vide order dated 26th June, 2023 referred to hereinabove, whereby appropriate directions have been passed to provide security cover to the petitioners.
5.
Disposed of.
(SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 19.12.2025
“Mir Arif” MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 23.12.25