Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010180342025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9215/2025 Between: Sri S.shajahan and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. VUTUPALLI RAJANNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9215/2025
This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 4th respondent in passing the eviction orders vide proceedings Roc.No.C/101/2024, dated 24.03.2025, without following procedure as contemplated under law, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioners are the owners and possessors of the residential houses to an extent of Ac.0.03 Cents each in Sy.No.1-3, situated in Ward No.1, Tirupati Road, Piler Town and Mandal, Annamayya District. The subject lands are in possession of the petitioners and after considering the same, the petitioners were issued with House Site Pattas vide VHS/379/2013 and VHS/380/2013 dated 11.01.2013, by respondent No.4. 4. While things stood thus, the official respondent No.4 issued a notice under Section 7 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905, (in short, ‘the Act, 1905’) on 21.06.2024, alleging that the petitioners were in occupation of the Government land to an extent of Ac.0.08 Cents, out of total extent of Ac.2.92 Cents. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that respondent No.4 proceeded further, pursuant to Section 7 Notice and passed an Order, dated 24.03.2025, directing the petitioners for eviction from the subject property under Section 6 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, which is an appealable order under Section 10 of the Act, 1905, before the respondent No.3/being Appellate Authority. 6.
It is also submitted that even without allowing the petitioners to approach the statutory appellate authority by way of an appeal as per Section 10 of the Act, 1905, where under the petitioners were provided 60 days for making such appeal to Respondent No.3, but, in mean time Respondent No.4 is trying to evict the petitioners with immediate effect, without observing 60 days of statutory period for submitting an appeal. Hence, the Writ Petition. 7. On the other hand, learned Government Pleader for the respondents submits that since the impugned order, dated 24.03.2025, is statutory appealable order under Section 10 of the Act, 1905, before the appellate authority i.e. respondent No.3/ Revenue Divisional Officer. In view of the effective statutory alternative remedy, the petitioners are not entitled to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 8. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents, this Court is of the considered view that the present Writ Petition can be disposed of, directing
the petitioners to prefer a statutory appeal under Section 10 of the Act, 1905, assailing the impugned order, dated 24.03.2025, within a period of three (03) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such an appeal, respondent No.3 is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and other stake holders, if any, within a reasonable time. In the meanwhile, the respondents are directed to not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners’ property. 9. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
08.04.2025 kbs
187
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
W.P.No.9215 of 2025
Dt: 08.04.2025
kbs