Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14530 (JHR)

SUBODH BAURI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./1601/2024 · 2025-04-04

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:10510 --1-- Cr.M.P. No. 1601 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1601 of 2024 ---- Subodh Bauri, aged about 44 years, son of Late Guhiram Bauri @ Gopi Bauri, resident of village – Sarkheldih, PO, PS and District - Jamtara .... Petitioner -- Versus -- 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Director General of Police, Jharkhand Ranchi 3. Additional Director General of Police, Crime Investigation Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. Inspector General of Police (Training)-cum-Nodal Officer, Centralized Public Grievances Cell, Jharkhand Ranchi 5. Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand Police, Ranchi 6. Inspector General of Police, Crime Investigation Department, Government of Jharkhand Ranchi 7. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Crime Investigation Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 8. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Dumka 9. Superintendent of Police, Crime Investigation Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 10. Superintendent of Police, Jamtara 11. Regional Deputy Superintendent of Police, Crime Investigation Department, Santhal Pargana Region, Dumka 12. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Government of Jharkhand, Dumka 13. Sub Divisional Police Officer, Jamtara 14. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Jamtara 15. Officer In-charge, SC/ST Police Station, Jamtara 2025:JHHC:10510 --2-- Cr.M.P. No. 1601 of 2024 16. Tarun Kumar Gupta, son of Late Shital Prasad Gupta, resident of village Sarkheldih, PO – Sarkheldih, PS – Jamtara, District – Jamtara .... Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate For State :- Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, APP ---- 06/04.04.2025 Heard Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. After some argument, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to move before the learned Court by way of filing proper petition. 3. In view of his such submission, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/