Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14528 (HP)

LOVE KUMAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/8350/2025 · 2025-05-22

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8350 of 2025 Decided on: 22nd May, 2025 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Love Kumar & Ors. …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .....Respondents ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.   Rajat   Choudhary,   Assistant Advocate General. ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Rajat Choudhary, learned Assistant Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioners   are   serving   in   the   respondent­Jal Shakti Department and have prayed for direction to the respondents to grant them work charge status from the date they completed eight years of service with all incidental benefits. 3. Learned   counsel   for   the   parties   have   jointly submitted that the issue involved in the writ petition and 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 the reliefs prayed for by the petitioners are now covered by the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in  The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Versus Surajmani & Anr.2. The respondent­Corporation was also the appellant before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in some of the connected matters. Learned counsel for the parties further submitted that   this   writ   petition   be   disposed   of   in   terms   of   the directions issued in the aforesaid decision. 4. In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the   parties   and   taking   into   consideration   the   aforesaid judgment, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to the   respondents/competent   authority   to   consider   the cases of the petitioners in accordance with law laid down in Surajmani2 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law   within   six   weeks   from   today.   Copy   of   the   order   so passed, be also communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua May 22, 2025 Judge rohit 2 Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, decided alongwith connected civil appeals on 06.02.2025