Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RFA-373 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
The Deputy Chief Engineer, Construction Division No.1 and another
Gurbagh
CORAM:
Present:
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Chief Engineer and another vs. Tilak Raj and another” vide order of even date.
23.12.2025 sanjay
3732-2017 (O&M)
[1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** Date of Decision: 23.12.2025
RFA No. The Deputy Chief Engineer, Construction Division No.1 and another
Versus Gurbagh and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Yogesh Putney, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kuber Vikas, Advocate, Mr. Yatin Chadha, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate Mr. Nitish Kaushal, Advocate Mr. Vipul Dharmani, Advocate, for the landowners.
Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
--- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) For orders, see RFA-4815 Chief Engineer and another vs. Tilak Raj and another” vide order of even date. 23.12.2025
(HARKESH MANUJA)
Whether speaking/reasoned?
Whether Reportable? 1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: 23.12.2025 RFA No. 3732-2017 (O&M) The Deputy Chief Engineer, Construction Division No.1
…….Appellants Versus
..….Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA sh Putney, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kuber Vikas, Advocate, Mr. Yatin Chadha, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate and Mr. Nitish Kaushal, Advocate, Dharmani, Advocate, Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punjab. 4815-2017, titled as “The Deputy Chief Engineer and another vs. Tilak Raj and another”, decided (HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No
Yes/No The Deputy , decided SANJAY GUPTA 2025.12.24 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document