Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14525 (JHR)

ANAWAR SHEIKH ALLIAS ANWAR SHAKH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3067/2025 · 2025-06-05

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:14564 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3067 of 2025 Anawar Sheikh @ Anwar Shakh, aged about 41 years, S/O Tajjul Sheikh, R/O Village – Karbala Hazi, Maksood Tola, PO & PS – Rajmahal, District – Sahebgunj. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP --- 02/05th June 2025 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail from apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 231 of 2024 instituted under Sections 318 (4) of the BNS 2023 along with Sections 66 (C ) & 66 (D) of the I.T. Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent which shows the lack of propensity to commit such crime. He further submits that the allegation of fraud, grabbing money by cheating as well as tampering with his mobile number, as alleged in the FIR, is totally false and fabricated and he has not committed and offence. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to extend privilege of anticipatory bail to this petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Rajmahal, Sahebganj, in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 231 of 2024. ( 2025:JHHC:14564 ) 2 6. It is made clear that petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation / trial. If the petitioner will not co-operate with the investigation / trial, the State would be at liberty to take appropriate action. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Aditi/Simran