APHC010180702017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1225/2017 Between: 1. M..VIJAY SEKHAR REDDY, S/O. M.JAYARAMI REDDY, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE, R/O/.1/201, KOTHURU, GOOTY TOWN, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P 2 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT. HYDERABAD. 2. KATTUBADI MAHAMRNAD RAFI, S/O.K.HAJA SAJEB, AGED 37 YEARS, MUSLIM, WORKING AS HEAD MASTER, MAHARSI DAYANANDA GURU KULAM, GOOTY. (A-2). RESIDING AT H.NO.9/919, OPP: POLICE STATION, GOOTY. 3. KAMALAPURAM NARAYANA REDDY, S/O. JAYARAMI REDDY, AGED 40 YEARS, HINDU, TEACHER, MARSHI DAYANANDA GURU KULAM, GOOTY, RESIDING AT D.NO. 1/916, DASARI STREET, GOOTY. (A-3) ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased topleased to set-aside the judgment of the Hon'ble VI ADDL. SESSION JUDGE , GOOTY passed Order in Crl.MP.No. 163 of 2017 in SC. 378 of 2016 dated 09- 03-2017 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 1974 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 2 pleased to stay all further proceedings in Crl.MP.No. 163 of 2017 in SC. 378 of 2016 dated 9-3-2017 Orders passed by Hon'ble VI ADDL. SESSION JUDGE , GOOTY and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to extend the interim orders dt 26/04/2017 passed in Crl.RC.MP.No. 1974 of 2017 in Crl.RC.No. 1225 of 2017 on the file of this Honble High Court, pending disposal of the Quash Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main case i.e., S.C.No.378 of 2016 was disposed of. 2. In view of the disposal of the main case itself, nothing remains in this Criminal Revision Case for further adjudication. 3. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 04.07.2025 SCS 3 204 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1225 of 2017 Date:04.07.2025 SCS