IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8033 of 2025 Date of Decision: 30.05.2025 _______________________________________________________ Nek Ram …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 30.05.2025, issued under the signatures of Director Animal Husbandry, Himachal Pradesh, learned Additional Advocate General states that impugned transfer order, whereby petitioner was transferred at two stations, has been cancelled. 2. Careful perusal of aforesaid communication as well as copy of office order dated 30.05.2025 annexed with the aforesaid communication, which are taken on record, clearly reveals that impugned transfer order has been cancelled and as such, nothing 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly same is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge May 30, 2025 (shankar)