IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 502/2025 Decided on: 06.06.2025 Madan Lal ...…Petitioner Versus Vinod Kumar …….Respondent …………………………………………………………………………………… Coram Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Following order was passed in the matter on 30.05.2025:- “ Petitioner’s grievance is that despite the directions issued in the judgment delivered in CWP No. 567 of 2025 (Madan Lal Vs. Divisional Commissioner, Kangra Division and Ors) decided on 08.01.2025, to respondent No.1 to decide the appeal within four months, the appeal has not been decided. Issue notice to the respondent, which is waived by Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta,Additional Advocate General. Compliance affidavit/reply be field within one week. List on 06.06.2025.” 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 2. Pursuant to above, learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record a copy of office instructions dated 05.06.2025 from the Divisional Commissioner, Kangra Division at Dharamshala, stating therein that the appeal titled as Madan Lal Vs. Ashwani & Ors.2 has been decided on 28.05.2025. 3. Taking note of above, the proceedings in the contempt petition are closed. Notice issued to the respondents are discharged. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge June 06, 2025 rohit 2CWP No.567/2025 decided on 08.01.2025