ADITYA KUMAR AWASTHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL.CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF TRANSPORT LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIC/5769/2025 · 2025-06-12
S Q H Rizvi, Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145200 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145200 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35343-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5769 of 2025 Petitioner :- Aditya Kumar Awasthi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl.Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Transport Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Arunendra Nath Mishra,Devendra Kumar,Kishore Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned State counsel for the State and perused the records. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the respondent No. 2/Senior Divisional Manager, New Indian Insurance Company Ltd., Hazratganj, Lucknow is hereby dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought the following main relief(s):-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No.-02 to decide the representation dated 05/05/2025, of the petitioner, contained as ANNEXURE No.01 to this writ petition. ii. Issue a writ order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No.02 to pay the accidental damage claim Rs.11,17,104.36/- of his Commercial Vehicle D.C.M. Registration No. U.P. 32 T.N. 4501 bearing Bima Policy No.770000 31240 380000 536 of The New India Insurance Company Ltd. with interest till actual payment to the petitioner."
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation dated 05.05.2025 to the respondent No. 2/Senior Divisional Manager, New Indian Insurance Company Ltd., Hazratganj, Lucknow, which is contained as Annexure No.01 to the instant petition, but no decision has been taken by the respondent No. 2 on the representation of the petitioner. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that ends of justice would suffice if necessary direction for disposal of the said representation of the petitioner is issued to the authority concerned within a stipulated time. To the aforesaid, there is no objection. Considering the aforesaid innocuous prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner, without entering into merits of the case, the respondent No. 2 is hereby directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 05.05.2025,
which is contained as Annexure No.01 to the instant petition, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a speaking and reasoned order with expedition. The petitioner is also at liberty to avail other remedies as may be available under the law for redressal of his grievances. The writ petition is disposed of finally in above terms. [Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.] [Saurabh Lavania,J.]
Order Date :- 12.6.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench