JATINDER MOHAN GARG ALIAS JATINDER MOHAN v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
CRA-S/218/2025 · 2025-07-07
Sandeep Moudgil
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14519 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14519 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Sr. No.: 210 Criminal Appeal No.S-218 of 2025 Date of Decision: July 07, 2025
Jatinder Mohan Garg @ Jatinder Mohan ..... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS State of Punjab ..... RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL
PRESENT: - Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocate, for the complainant.
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (Oral)
By way of the present appeal filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the appellant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.182 dated 04.12.2024, under Sections 3(1)(s) and 3(1)(r) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, registered at Police Station Bareta, District Mansa.
2. This Court vide order dated 24.04.2025 granted the concession of interim bail to the appellant, subject to his joining the investigation.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the
order dated 24.04.2025, the petitioner has joined the investigation.
4. Learned State counsel does not controvert the said fact and further submits that custodial interrogation of the appellant is not required.
5. In view of the above, the order dated 24.04.2025 is made absolute.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL)
Judge July 07, 2025 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned: Yes/ No Whether Reportable: Yes/ No AVIN KUMAR 2025.07.07 20:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
judgment/order.