APHC010181272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9452/2025 Between: Goparaju Venkata Subramanyam and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SAI SARAN CHODISETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the premises belonging to the petitioners has been locked by the 3rd respondent and kept the key along with him. It is submitted that the lease between the petitioners and the 4th respondent has been terminated on account of the 4th respondent being indulged in activities which are prohibited under law in the premises belongs to the petitioners. It is submitted that the police do not have powers to 2 seize the immovable property under Section 102 Cr.P.C., and relies on the judgment of High Court of Telangana in the matter of Raparthy Srinivas vs. State of Telangana1. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home, on instructions, submits that, the premises is not locked by the 3rd respondent and that they are not aware as to who locked the premises. 4. Recording the above submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of, leaving it open for the petitioners to take necessary steps in that regard. No costs. 5. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated : 17.04.2025 BMS 1 2020 SCC OnLine TS 150