Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 145153 (ALL)

RAVI PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

CRLP/5509/2025 · 2025-06-23

Kshitij Shailendra, Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36099-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5509 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ravi Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sadhu Sharan Chaubey,Abha Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. In substance, the grievance of the writ petitioner is that F.I.R. should be registered against respondent Nos.6 and 7 as they have embezzled public money. 3. In the considered opinion of the Court, Section 175(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short 'the B.N.S.S., 2023') takes care of the said situation and it is always open for the petitioner to invoke the said provision in accordance with law. 4. No mandamus as sought for can be granted. 5. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take steps in accordance with the provisions of Section 175(3) of B.N.S.S., 2023. Order Date :- 23.6.2025 Jyotsana (Kshitij Shailendra, J.) (Pankaj Bhatia, J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench