Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14514 (AP)

Kammari Ramadas Achari, v. STATE OF AP

WP/7836/2018 · 2025-07-13

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010180222018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 7836/2018 Between: 1. KAMMARI RAMADAS ACHARI,, KAMMARI RAMADAS ACHARI, S/O. LATE NARASIHMA ACHARI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, BLACKSMITH, H.NO. 4/44, SIRALADODDI VILLAGE, YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT KURNOOL 2. KATTUBADI UMMAR FAROOQ,, S/O. S. KHAJA HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RED CHILLI POWDER BUSINESS, H.NO. 9/23, MUGATHI PET, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 3. S. SHAIKSHAVALI,, S/O. S. INAYATULLAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, WELDER, PEDDAKATIKAGERI, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. MULLA MAHABOOB BASHA,, S/O. LATE H ABOUT 23 YEARS, VEGETABLE COMMISSION AGENT, H.NO. 9/752, NTR COLONY, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. KADIMETLA GOPAL ACHARI,, S/O. CHANDRANNA ACHARI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, BLACKSMITH, H.NO. 2/209, KADIMENTLA VILLAGE, YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, 6. SMT. M. RANEMMA,, W/O. M. NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RED CHILLI POWDER BUSINESS, SC COLONY, PULACHINTA VILLAGE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 7836/2018 KAMMARI RAMADAS ACHARI,, KAMMARI RAMADAS ACHARI, S/O. LATE NARASIHMA ACHARI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, BLACKSMITH, H.NO. 4/44, SIRALADODDI VILLAGE, YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT KURNOOL KATTUBADI UMMAR FAROOQ,, S/O. S. KHAJA HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RED CHILLI POWDER BUSINESS, H.NO. 9/23, MUGATHI PET, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT S. SHAIKSHAVALI,, S/O. S. INAYATULLAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, WELDER, PEDDAKATIKAGERI, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL MULLA MAHABOOB BASHA,, S/O. LATE HUSSAIN PEETA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, VEGETABLE COMMISSION AGENT, H.NO. 9/752, NTR COLONY, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. KADIMETLA GOPAL ACHARI,, S/O. CHANDRANNA ACHARI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, BLACKSMITH, H.NO. 2/209, KADIMENTLA VILLAGE, YEMMIGANUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. SMT. M. RANEMMA,, W/O. M. NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RED CHILLI POWDER BUSINESS, SC COLONY, PULACHINTA VILLAGE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] KAMMARI RAMADAS ACHARI,, KAMMARI RAMADAS ACHARI, S/O. LATE NARASIHMA ACHARI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, BLACKSMITH, H.NO. 4/44, SIRALADODDI VILLAGE, YEMMIGANUR KATTUBADI UMMAR FAROOQ,, S/O. S. KHAJA HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RED CHILLI POWDER BUSINESS, H.NO. 9/23, S. SHAIKSHAVALI,, S/O. S. INAYATULLAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, WELDER, PEDDAKATIKAGERI, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL USSAIN PEETA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, VEGETABLE COMMISSION AGENT, H.NO. 9/752, KADIMETLA GOPAL ACHARI,, S/O. CHANDRANNA ACHARI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, BLACKSMITH, H.NO. 2/209, KADIMENTLA SMT. M. RANEMMA,, W/O. M. NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RED CHILLI POWDER BUSINESS, SC COLONY, ...PETITIONER(S) 2 1. STATE OF AP, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY AMARAVATHI 2. THE YEMMIGANUR MUNICIPALITY, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this Court, while admitting the writ petition on 09.03.2018, directed the respondents not to disturb the petitioners from the subject property. However, on 15.03.2018, this Court further directed that the petitioners shall not make any alterations or constructions without obtaining approval from the concerned respondents. 2. It is further submitted that, after grant of interim orders, there has been no change in the possession of the petitioners, and the petitioners are still in possession of the property. It is also submitted that this Writ Petition can be closed in terms of the interim orders granted by this Court. 3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submits that he has no objection for closing this Writ Petition. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed in terms of the interim orders granted by this Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 14.07.2025 PNS