Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14513 (CHH)

SHIVSHANKAR YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRA/591/2025 · 2025-04-11

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:17006 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 578 of 2025 Hemant Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Heeraram Yadav Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Kauhakuda, Police Outpost- Sonakhan, Thana - Kasdol, Distt.- Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Appellant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Outpost- Sonakhan, Thana - Kasdol, Distt.- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Respondent 2025:CGHC:17022 CRA No. 591 of 2025 Shivshankar Yadav Ramgopal Yadav Aged About 26 Years R/o Village- Kauhakuda, Chowki- Sonakhan, P.S Kasdol, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Police Station House Officer- Thana- Kasdol, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Respective Appellants : Shri Sunil Sahu, and Shri Deepak Kumar Jain, Advocates For Respondent/State : Ms Priya Sharma, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 11.04.2025 CRA 578 and 591 of 2025 2 1. These two appeals arise out of Special Case ST/SC-1 of 2025. 2. Pursuant order dated 21.03.2025 and 24.02.2025 in the respective appeals, the victims/complainants appeared through virtual mode from the DLSA Baloda Bazar, and raised objection in granting bail to the appellants. Their objection has been taken on record. 3. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the respective appellants seek permission of this court for withdrawal of the appeals, to which learned State counsel has not opposed. 4. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma