APHC010180162015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 24822 OF Between: B.J.Ram Sanitary Labour Society, The Adoni Municipality and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 2. MD SALEEM (SC MC RSEEMA SPSR NLR) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 24822 OF 2015 am Sanitary Labour Society, AND The Adoni Municipality and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) MD SALEEM (SC MC RSEEMA SPSR NLR) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 24822 OF 2015 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “…..to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus to declare the action of the 1st respondent municipality in not awarding the contract in favour of the petitioner society in pursuant to the 1st Tender Notice vide T.No.645/ADN / Mplty/ Genl Funds/ 2014-15 dated 18.04.2015 and further issuing 2nd call even in spite of the fact that the petitioner society is successful bidder in pursuant to the 1st tender notice dated 18.04.2015 as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to award the contract in favour of the petitioner society in pursuant to the Tender Notice vide T.No 68-01/ADN/Mplty/Genl Funds/2014-15 dated 18.04.2015 issued by the 1st respondent and pass such other orders....” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for an adjudication by this Court. 3. While recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 21.03.2025 KK