Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14512 (PNJ)

SARWAN SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/1782/2020 · 2025-02-13

Aman Chaudhary

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 226 CWP-1782-2020 Sarwan Singh vs CWP-1845-2021 Jagdish Chand v CORAM: HO Present: Mr Ms Mr in C Ms for Mr *** AMAN CHAUD 1. The of together. 2. Pra to release pensi rendered as qual 3. Lea covered by the j Punjab and o 31.10.2013 (An 28.04.2014 so al 4. The hearing, learned consider the ma period of 4 mo would not addre 5. The N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH Date of de 2020 (O&M) ingh vs. State of Punjab and others 2021 (O&M) hand vs. State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN Mr. Suram Singh Rana, Advocate f Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Pranav Chadha, Advocate for r in CWP-1845-2021. Ms. Sanya, Advocate for Mr. Sarth for respondent No.4 in CWP-1782 Mr. HS Jugait, Advocate for respon *** HAUDHARY, J. (Oral) These cases involve similar issues Prayer made in the present petition pensionary benefits by taking into a as qualifying service in Ranjit Sagar D Learned counsel submits that ca y the judgment passed in Jagdish Ram and others, CWP-10757-1999 and (Annexure P12), against which L so also the SLP on 16.02.2015, whic The aforesaid facts having been b earned State counsel, on instructions, the matter and decide, taking note of months, which this Court has no t address in a just, fair and reasonable m The aforesaid satisfies the learned c NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH te of decision: 13.02.2025 AMAN CHAUDHARY ocate for the petitioner. te for respondent No.4 . Sarthak Gupta, Advocate 1782-2020. respondent No.6. issues and therefore, are being dispose etitions is for directing the responden into account the work charge service agar Dam. case of the petitioner is square h Ram (deceased) thr. LR vs. State o 9 and connected case, decided o ich LPA-690-2014 was dismissed o , which was implemented. been brought out, during the course o ctions, states that the respondents sha ote of the aforesaid judgment, within as no reason to believe the authoritie nable manner. arned counsel for the petitioner. isposed ondents services squarely State of ded on ssed on ourse of shall within a thorities ASHOK KUMAR 2025.02.14 11:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-1782-2020 and connected case -2- 6. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to him and shall contain reasons, whereupon he shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 7. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 13.02.2025 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2025.02.14 11:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document