Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 145114 (ALL)

HARE KRISHNA TRIPATHI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/5021/2025 · 2025-06-05

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34831-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5021 of 2025 Petitioner :- Hare Krishna Tripathi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Kumar Rai,Ajai Kumar,Ayush Tandon Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record. 2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 26.05.2025 bearing FIR/Case Crime No.0158/2025, for the offence under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of BNS and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act, registered at Police Station Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offences as alleged in FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Code of Criminal Procedure. 4. Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioners, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in re: Satendra Kumar Antil vs. CBI and others in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 5191 of 2021 and (2014) 8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another. 5. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioners states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (supra) and Arnesh Kumar (supra). 7. However, It is directed that the petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station on 12.06.2025 at 11.00 a.m. sharp for the purpose to cooperate in the investigation. Thereafter, they shall continue to cooperate in the investigation till its completion. Failing which, the protection of this order would not be available to them. Order Date :- 5.6.2025 Anurag . (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench