Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 145112 (ALL)

HARI RAM @ HARI RAM VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE LKO. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/5868/2025 · 2025-06-17

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35728 Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5868 of 2025 Petitioner :- Hari Ram @ Hari Ram Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Shankar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Ravi Shankar Mishra, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Raj Bux Singh, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Mohan Singh, the learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. 2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the validity of orders dated 04.04.2024 and 25.01.2023 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Amethi in Case No.323 of 2023, under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 3. The learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel as well as the learned counsel for Gaon Sabha have raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has got a statutory remedy of filing an appeal under Section 24(4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. Confronted with this preliminary objection, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the writ petition and the petitioner will avail a statutory remedy of filing an appeal. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by observing that, in case, the petitioner files an appeal under Section 24(4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in accordance with law. [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] Order Date :- 17.6.2025 cks/- Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench