SHIV NARAIN SHUKL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY.REVENUE LKO. AND 9 OTHERS
WRIC/5744/2025 · 2025-06-05
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145082 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145082 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34665-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5744 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shiv Narain Shukl Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy.Revenue Lko. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Nayak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J.
1. Heard. 2. This petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:
"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the respondent authorities to vacate the Gata no. 296 area 0.554 hectare, situated village Godhani, Post Ummarpur, Pargana Akbarpur, Tehsil Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar from the illegal encroachment of the respondent no. 8 to 9 within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court and handed over the petitioner. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus to the authorities/opposite parties no. 2 to 7 for taking an action against land grabbers/unscrupulous elements under the Government Order dated 01.05.2017 wherein a complete mechanism has been provided under Government Order for removal of encroachment made by unsocial elements from public as well as private land. (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the respondent no. 2- Commissioner, Ayodhya, Division, Ayodhya to decide the application dated 07.11.2024 filed by the petitioner within stipulated period as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court. (iv) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the respondent no. 8 to 9 not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioner over the land in dispute."
3. There is a dispute between the petitioner and private opposite parties, which is not amenable to the writ jurisdiction. 4. At this stage, the petitioner states that the demarcation exercise cannot be completed because of the resistance put up by the private opposite parties which has led to the lodging of an FIR by the Revenue authorities. As far as demarcation is concerned, the petitioner may approach the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Akbarpur, Ambedkar Nagar, who may get the matter looked into and if any such exercise is required to be
done as per the statute i.e. U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, he shall take all necessary steps. 5. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
Order Date :- 5.6.2025 K.Tiwari (Praveen Kumar Giri, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench