Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14504 (UTT)

RAJA RAM v. NAGAR PALIKA DEHRADUN AS IT THEN WAS, THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER

WPMS/2323/2011 · 2025-10-28

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

` SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.2323 of 2011 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Harsh Rautela, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for the respondents. 3. Learned proxy counsel for the petitioner submits that he has got no instructions in the matter. 4. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 28.10.2025 SK