BHISMA DEO MAHTO ALIAS HADIA MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY
LPA/389/2019 · 2025-03-24
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14503 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14503 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
L.P.A. No. 389 of 2019
Bhisma Deo Mahto @ Hadia Mahto, aged about 50 years, son of Ramdhan Mahato, resident of Village-Baruhatu, P.O. Danadih, P.S. Sonahatu, District-Ranchi
.....Appellant
Versus 1) The State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Project Building Dhurwa, Ranchi. 2) The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi. 3) The Additional Collector, Ranchi. 4) The Circle Officer, Sonahatu, at, P.O & P.S Sonahatu, District- Ranchi 5) The Block Development Officer, Sonahatu, at, P.O & P.S Sonahatu, District-Ranchi 6) The Officer-in-Charge, Sonahatu, at, P.O & P.S. Sonahatu, District-Ranchi
...Respondents
---- CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--- For the Appellant : Mr. Pradip Gangopadhyay, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sushant Kumar, A.C to S.C.-II
--- 06/ Dated: 24.03.2025
The counsel on record reports that he has given No Objection Certificate to the party and the same has also been recorded in the order dated 09.02.2021 in this L.P.A. However, the appellant does not appear to have engaged anybody else to argue the case nor has he appeared today to himself argue this appeal.
Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.
(M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.)
(Deepak Roshan, J.) jk/vikas