Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 145017 (PNJ)

GURCHARAN SINGH v. NAND KISHORE

RSA/1718/2016 · 2025-11-10

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-1718- IN THE HIG 241 Gurcharan S Nand Kishor CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent ju suit for recov 2. the main sec reveal(s) th adjourned ei pretext or th appellant. 13.01.2020 a un-represent Registry w 3. received as -2016 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o aran Singh Versus Kishore M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-defendant is in rrent judgments and decrees of both t r recovery filed by the respondent-plai The matter pertains to the year ain second appeal is yet to be issued. (s) that since the inception of pre ned either at the request of learned co t or the other; or on account of non ant. Further, for the last 03 dates of 2020 and 08.02.2023 (last date of he resented. Accordingly, on the last da was directed to inform learned coun Pursuant thereto, office report ed as per which learned counsel for ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1718-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.11.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA is in second appeal against the both the Courts below whereby the plaintiff was decreed. e year 2016 and notice of motion in ssued. Perusal of the order-sheet(s) of present appeal, the same was ned counsel for the appellant on one f non-appearance on behalf of the ates of hearing i.e. on 03.05.2017, of hearing) the appellant had gone last date of hearing i.e. 08.02.2023, d counsel both the parties. report dated 06.11.2025 has been sel for both the parties have been the the n in et(s) was one the 017, one 023, een een RISHU KATARIA 2025.11.11 14:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-1718- informed ab appearance o 4. has exhibite litigation. It Court has be interest of ju casual and c counsel is Court is left prosecution 5. 6. 10.11.2025 rishu -2016 (O&M) -2- ed about the date fixed, but despite rance on behalf of either of the parties. A bare reading of the above xhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppor t of justice. On the other hand, the ap and careless approach. It is clear tha seriously interested in pursuing t is left with no other option except t ution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable espite that today, none has put in arties. facts shows that the appellant tude in his pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the opportunities to the appellant in the the appellant has adopted an utterly ear that neither the appellant nor his suing the present matter. Thus, this cept to dismiss the same for non- any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No t in llant sent the the ly his this RISHU KATARIA 2025.11.11 14:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.