Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:33760-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 304/2024 IN D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 10229/2021 Subhram S/o Shrichand, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Guwariya Ki Dhani, Sanchod, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. Kuldeep Ranka, Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Dr. O.P. Bairwa, District Collector Khairthal, District Khairthal.
3. Uttam Singh Shekhawat, Additional Collector (Second) And Officer-In-Charge Vigilance Cell, Collectorate Alwar, District Alwar.
4. Priyanka Badgurjar, Sub Divisional Officer Mundawar, District Khairthal.
5. Madan Singh, Tehsildar Tehsil Khairthal, District Khairthal.
6. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arun Singh Shekhawat with Ms. Karishma Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Guru Charan Singh Gill, AAG with Mr. Manoj Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
Order 26/08/2025
1. This contempt petition is filed pleading willful disobedience of
order dated 04.01.2022 wherein, the writ petition was disposed of in view of the directions issued by this Court in Jagdish Prashad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 10819/2018 decided on 30.01.2019.
[2025:RJ-JP:33760-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-304/2024]
2. The grievance raised is that all the encroachments have yet not been removed. The stand taken by the respondents is that representation of the petitioner was considered and proceedings under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 were initiated and necessary action in accordance with law was taken.
3. This petition is disposed of with direction that Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) shall pass a speaking order on the representation of the petitioner and detailing the encroachments identified and the actions taken. This needful be done within six weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of this order. Notices are discharged.
4. Needless to say that petitioner shall be at liberty to avail alternative remedy available in accordance with law if aggrieved with the decision of the representation.
(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J DANISH USMANI /25