Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 145005 (ALL)

RAM BILAS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLRD/55/2016 · 2025-08-26

Saurabh Lavania

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 55 of 2016 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. C.M.A. No.6926 of 2016 (Application for Condonation of Delay) Case called out. No one appeared on behalf of revisionist to press this application as well as revision. However, learned A.G.A. is present. 1. Assailing the order dated 19.09.2025 passed by Additional District & Session Judge, Lucknow in Criminal Appeal No.0000544 of 2014 which was preferred against the judgment and order dated 31.10.2014 whereby the opposite party no.2 was declared juvenile by the Juvenile Justice Board, the instant revision has been filed alongwith application seeking condonation of delay in filing the revision, i.e. the application under consideration. 2. The following main averments have been made in the present application for condoning the delay in filing the revision:- "2. That the deponent is informant and is a poor person somehow the other he managed his bread by selling the milk, he is also having the some land which is not sufficient to meet out the expenses of his family member. 3. That the deponent could not manage the necessary fund towards the expenses and advocate fee to file the above noted revision well within time. 4. That the deponent has managed the necessary fund towards expenses and advocate fee in the 2nd week of Jan. 2016 then he is filing the present revision with any further delay." 3. Since no-one has appeared to press the application seeking condonation of delay, hence the same is rejected. 4. Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Satish Chandra Sitapuri Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate Ram Bilas .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Order on Revision Since the application for condonation is rejected, consequently, the revision also stands dismissed. 5. August 26, 2025 Anand/- CRLRD No. 55 of 2016 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench