KANAKADURGA FINANCE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORT, GUJARAT
SCA/9042/2025 · 2026-05-04
Hemant M Prachchhak
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1450 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1450 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
C/SCA/9042/2025 ORDER DATED: 04/05/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9042 of 2025 ========================================== KANAKADURGA FINANCE LIMITED Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORT, GUJARAT & ORS. ========================================== Appearance: MR PM DAVE(263) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR NIKUN KANARA AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2 MR. SANDIP C BHATT(6324) for the Respondent(s) No. 5 NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 3,4 ==========================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Date : 04/05/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Present petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and under the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Act seeking the following reliefs:-
“(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to allow this petition by issue a writ or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing respondent No.2 to cancel the entry of respondent No.4 as original owner and respondent No.5 as financier for the vehicle bearing registration No.GJ-02-DJ-8233 and further be pleased to show / mention the name petitioner as financier and respondent No.3 as original owner as prayer in application dtd. 25.03.2025 in accordance with law in the interest of justice and equity. (B) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to call for action taken report from respondent No.2 and after perusing the same, further be pleased to direct respondent No.2 and after perusing the same, further be pleased to direct respondent No.2 to take a decision on the representation dtd. 25.03.2025 in accordance with law and within stipulated time, in the interest of justice and equity.
C/SCA/9042/2025 ORDER DATED: 04/05/2026 (C) YOUR LORDSHIP may be pleased to pass any other direction /
order as deemed fit and proper in the facts of the present case, in the interest of justice.”
2. Heard Mr.Dave, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Kanara, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent – authorities at length.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted the same facts narrated in the memo of petition and has also submitted that the authority has cancelled the hypothecation issued in favour of the petitioner, which caused huge loss to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the respondent authority be
directed to cancel the hypothecation in favour of respondent No.4 and take decision on the pending representation made by the petitioner after giving an opportunity of hearing and in accordance with law.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the application for cancellation is pending since long and the same is yet not decided and, therefore, the present petition be allowed and the respondent – authority be directed to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner within stipulated time.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent – authorities has opposed the petition and has submitted that the petition being meritless deserves to be dismissed.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the
submissions made on behalf of both the sides and averments made in the petition and the fact that the application / representation for cancellation is pending since long, which is yet not decided, this Court
C/SCA/9042/2025 ORDER DATED: 04/05/2026 is of the opinion that the petition deserves to be disposed of with a direction to the respondent – authority to decide the representation made by the petitioner within stipulated time.
6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed in part. The concerned respondent – authority is directed to decide the application / representation made by the petitioner as early as possible preferably within a period of three months in accordance with law and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the petitioner may agitate such grievance which is available under the law. Direct service is permitted.
(HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J) V.R. PANCHAL Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: VIJAYKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PANCHAL(HC00171), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 04/05/2026 17:35:16