AKASH SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/4814/2025 · 2025-06-05
Manjive Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144998 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144998 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34760 Court No. - 5 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4814 of 2025 Applicant :- Akash Srivastava Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Kumar Singh,Vijay Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Awanish Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel on behalf of Opposite Party No. 2, is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State and Sri Ankit Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Awanish Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing for Opposite Party No. 2. 3. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of B.N.S.S., 2023 has been filed for quashing the impugned summoning order dated 06.05.2023 passed in Complaint Case No. 101 of 2022 ( Priyanka Srivastava Vs. Akash Srivastava & Others) under Sections 323, 498-A, 504 I.P.C. & Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Aspur Devsara, District Pratapgarh, pending in the court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)/F.T.C. IInd, Pratapgarh. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which had taken place between the parties has been filed before this Court as Annexure No. 4 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the trial court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court
and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned, in that scenario, will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of 45 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 9.
The office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. Order Date :- 5.6.2025 A. Mandhani Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK MANDHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench