M. SULTAN BASHA, ANANTAPUR DIST. v. C-P.O., INDUS. TRIBUNAL & ANO.
WP/34830/2011 · 2025-07-03
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14499 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14499 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010179592011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 34830/2011 Between:
1. M. SULTAN BASHA, S/O. M. SARMAS SAB EX-CONDUCTOR, E.77837 R/O. URAVAKONDA, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
2. SMT. M. KHAJA BEE, W/O LATE M. SULTAN BASHA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O.URAVAKONDA, ANANTAPUR DIST. PETITIONER NO. 2 BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LR TO THE DECEASED 1ST PETITIONER AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 25-01-2024 VIDE I.A.NO. 1 OF 2015 (W.P.M.P.NO.19650 OF 2015) IN WP NO. 34830 OF 2011.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. CP O INDUS TRIBUNAL, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM- PRESIDING OFFICER, ANANTAPUR.
2. THE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC, KALYANADURGAM DEPOT, KALYANADURGAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1st respondent in M.P.No.7 of 2008 and issue an appropriate writ, order or direction; more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and quash the
order passed by the 1st respondent in M.P.No.7 of 2008 dated 13.04.2011, in disallowing the interest as illegal, unjust, contrary to law and perverse and further declare that the petitioner is entitled for interest of Rs.1,26,484/- from the 2nd respondent by directing the 2nd respondent to pay the said amount.
IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 43303 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date of hearing of the writ petition.
2
IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 19650 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to bring the petitioner on record as Legal Representative of late M. Sultan Basha, to prosecute the case before this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice and fair-play.
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR LABOUR
2. K VISWANATHAM (SC FOR APSRTC)
The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO. 34830 of 2011
ORDER:
Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioners. It evinces that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting their case.
Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 04.07.2025 SPP
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Writ Petition No:34830 of 2011
Date : 04.07.2025
SPP