HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6144/2025 Jodhraj Meena Son Of Shri Hemraj Meena, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Tehsil Pipalda District Kota (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The District Collector, Kota (Rajasthan). 3. The Tehsildar, Pipalda District Kota (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 29/04/2025 1. A limited prayer has been made for issuing directions to the respondents to decide the representations of the petitioner expeditiously as early as possible within a time frame. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of grievance, the petitioner approached the authority concerned by way of filing two different representations on 13.07.2023 and 11.02.2025, but in-spite of passing of considerable time, till date, those representations have not been decided by the authorities concerned by passing a reasoned and speaking order. (2 of 2) [CW-6144/2025] 3. Learned counsel further submits that the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Pawan Meena Versus State of Rajasthan (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024 decided on 02.02.2024) has directed all the Departments of the State to decide the representation within a stipulated time, but inspite of passing of the said order, till date, the representation submitted by the petitioner has not been decided. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the representations (pending, if any) expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 6. The stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 7. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representations of the petitioner in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/123