Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14494 (KAR)

MANJEGOWDA S/O MOODLIGIRIGOWDA SINCE DEAD BY LRS, BHAGYA v. CHIEF SECRETARY

MSA/120/2021 · 2025-02-28

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8758 MSA No. 120 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 120 OF 2021 BETWEEN: 1. MANJEGOWDA S/O MOODLIGIRIGOWDA SINCE DEAD BY LRS, BHAGYA, W/O ALTE MANJEGOWDA AGED 50 YEARS, 2. K.M.SOWJANYA, D/O LAE MANJEGOWDA AGED 29 YEARS, 3. K.M.SOMYA, D/O LATE MANJEGOWDA, AGED 26 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT KANDALI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALURU. 2. CHIEF SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8758 MSA No. 120 of 2021 GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU. 3. MANAGING DIRECTOR CAUVERY NEERAVARI NIGAMA LTD., JALAMAIL MY INFORMATION CENTRE BUILDING, ANANDA RAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU. 4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER YAGACHI RESERVOIR PROJECT, HALEBEEDU BELUR ROAD, BELUR, HASSAN DISTRICT. 5. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER HEMAVATHI RESERVOIR PLANNING-2 (H.R.PII), D.C.OFFICE COMPLEX, HASSAN-572 201. …RESPONDENTS THIS MSA FILED UNDER SECTION 54(2) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT., PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.11.2019 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, HASSAN IN L.A.C. (APPEAL) NO. 02/2015 CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HASSAN ON 01.10.2012 IN LAC NO. 14/11, THEREBY ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION SUITABLY. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8758 MSA No. 120 of 2021 ORAL JUDGMENT No representation on appellants' side on call. The appeal was filed in the year 2021. Since then, the matter stood adjourned several times, accommodating the appellants to comply the office objections. However, till now, office objections are not complied. This Court does not find any grounds to extend the time further. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE DS CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13