Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144884 (ALL)

RAJAT KULSHRESTHA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND ANOTHER

A482/4798/2025 · 2025-06-05

Manjive Shukla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34722 Court No. - 5 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4798 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajat Kulshrestha And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jagjeet Singh,Anju Srivastava,Devendra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohammad Aziz Mansuri,Mohit Sharma Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Mohit Sharma, learned counsel on behalf of Opposite Party No.2, is taken on record. 2. Heard Ms. Anju Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the applicants, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State and Sri Mohit Sharma, learned counsel appearing for Opposite Party No.2. 3. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 B.N.S.S., 2023 has been filed for quashing the Charge Sheet dated 26.5.2023 as well as entire proceedings of the Case No.81833/2023 (State of U.P. Vs. Rajat Kulshresthra and others) in connection to the Case Crime No.729/2022, under Sections 498-A, 323, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which had taken place between the parties has been filed before this Court as Annexure No.5 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the trial court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned, in that scenario, will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. The office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. Order Date :- 5.6.2025 Salim Digitally signed by :- SALIM PRAVEJ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench