VIKASH KUMAR @ SONU @ KATIYA S/O OMPRAKASH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4756/2025 · 2025-05-02
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14488 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14488 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:18481] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4756/2025 Vikash Kumar @ Sonu @ Katiya S/o Omprakash, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Mawadi, Police Station Sadar Behror, District Kotputali, Behror, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Central Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anish Bhadala For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 02/05/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.293/2023 registered at Police Station-Ajeetgardh, District-Neem Ka Thana for the offences under Section 307 IPC and Sections 3/25 and 5/27 of Arms Act, 1959 (Amended 2019).
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR and no recovery has been affected from him. The main culprit is Sandeep @ Pehalwan who fired at the Badri Prasad. Petitioner is behind the
[2025:RJ-JP:18481] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4756/2025] bars since 10.02.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, especially the fact that the no physical injury was caused to the victim and nothing overt act is attributed to petitioner but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Vikash Kumar @ Sonu @ Katiya S/o Omprakash shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/185