FATEH BAHADUR SINGH AND 11 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SECONDARY EDUCATION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/5731/2025 · 2025-06-04
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144873 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144873 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34568 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5731 of 2025 Petitioner :- Fateh Bahadur Singh And 11 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atul Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Girish Chandra Verma,Uday Veer Singh Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Notice on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2 has been accepted by the office of Chief Standing counsel. Sri Uday Veer Singh learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3 submits that though he has received copy but the appropriate party would be District Inspector of Schools. Sri Atul Kumar Dwivedi learned counsel for the petitioner also moved an application seeking correction in the array of parties and the same is taken on record. Considering the said application which is only formal in nature and there is no impact on the merit of the case, consequently, the said application is allowed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner shall carry out the necessary corrections during course of the day. Sri G.C Verma learned counsel appearing on caveat and he has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability primarily on the ground that the order under challenge before this Court dated 21.05.2025 has lost its efficacy in as much as by the said order an observer was appointed and in furtherance thereof the election of the Committee of Management has been held on 31.05.2025 and moreover in furtherance thereof the signatures of the Manager has also been attested on 2nd of June,
2025.
Learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage submits that in so far as the subsequent events are concerned the same is not disputed, however, he submits that his petition before the prescribed authority which is pending may be expedited which is his prayer no.3.
Learned counsel for the State as well as Sri Verma counsel for the private respondent submit that in case if such an order is passed, they have no objection. Considering the facts and circumstances, this petition is being considered only in so far as prayer no.3 is concerned and the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Prescribed Authority to consider and decide the petition as expeditiously as possible after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties preferably within a period of six months from the date a copy of this order is placed before the Prescribed Authority. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 4.6.2025 Harshita Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench