Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37745 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3916 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shakeel Ahmad And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue U.P. Lko. And 24 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jagat Narain Dixit,Vishwesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Jagat Narain Dixit, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. With the consent of the parties, notice to private respondents are dispensed with. 3. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing of stay order of status quo dated 14.02.2023 in favour of respondents and for a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the Revision No. 2220/2022m U/S 210 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner has confined his prayer to prayer No. 2 made in the writ petition which is for a suitable direction to the Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the Revision No. 2220/2022m U/S 210 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously considering the fact that more than two and half years have lapsed since filing of the same. He has submitted that till date service has not been effected to private respondents due to which the matter is pending. 5. Learned Standing Counsel does not oppose to the aforesaid request made by learned counsel for petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 / Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to expedite the proceedings of Revision No. 2220/2022m U/S 210 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 7. A perusal of the order-sheet, further indicates that most of occasions the case was listed but a call of boycott of the local bar association. 8. Learned counsel for petitioner has vehemently pleaded and stated that due appearance would not be made on behalf of the petitioners before the respondent No. 2 on all the dates when the matter is listed irrespective of the call of the local bar association. 9. Considering the statement made by learned counsel for petitioners, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 / Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to expedite the proceedings of Revision No. 2220/2022m U/S 210 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Subject to the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, respondent No. 2 / Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is further directed to conclude the proceedings within six months from the date of service is effected on the private respondents in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 4.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench