Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144851 (ALL)

RUDRABHAN PRATAP SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/4797/2025 · 2025-06-05

Manjive Shukla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34718 Court No. - 5 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4797 of 2025 Applicant :- Rudrabhan Pratap Singh And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Pratap Singh,Saurabh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Rajan Singh, learned counsel on behalf of Opposite Party No.2, is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Arun Pratap Singh, learned counsel appearing for the applicants, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State and Sri Rajan Singh, learned counsel appearing for Opposite Party No.2. 3. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 B.N.S.S., 2023 has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings in F.I.R. No.0164 of 2023 dated 19.6.2023, lodged under Sections 427, 504, 506 I.P.C., the impugned Charge Sheet dated 15.8.2023 and the summoning order dated 2.12.2023 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which had taken place between the parties has been filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the trial court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned, in that scenario, will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. The office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. Order Date :- 5.6.2025 Salim Digitally signed by :- SALIM PRAVEJ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench