DILIP SINGH v. THE LEARNED COURT OF ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT NO. 31 DISTT. SULTANPUR AND ANOTHER
A483/492/2025 · 2025-06-05
Manjive Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144842 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 144842 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34727 Court No. - 5 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 492 of 2025 Applicant :- Dilip Singh Opposite Party :- The Learned Court Of Addl. Judicial Magistrate Court No. 31 Distt. Sultanpur And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ankit Pandey,Navneet Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
1. Heard Sri Ankit Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State.
2. In view of the nature of the order proposed, notice to Opposite Party No.2 is hereby dispensed with.
3. The instant application under Section 483 Cr.P.C./529 B.N.S.S., 2023 has been filed inter-alia praying therein for the following relief:
"Issue an order or direction to expedite the proceedings of Criminal Case No.615 of 2021 (new No.2570 of 2024), under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, relating to police station Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur, Dilip Singh Versus Rajendra Kumar @ Rajendra Kumar Sahu, pending before the learned court of Additional Judicial Magistrate, Court No.31, Sultanpur, within specific period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court in the circumstances of the case."
4. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant has submitted that a complaint case for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act had been filed by the applicant in the year 2021 and later on, in the year 2024 it was re-numbered as Case No.2570/2024 (Dilip Singh Versus Rajendra Kumar @ Rajendra Kumar Sahu). It has further been submitted that since the year 2021, the said complaint case is pending before the trial court and has yet not been decided.
5. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State submits that this Court may provide that the complaint case in question may be decided by the trial court expeditiously.
6. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and I find that the complaint case in question was filed way back in the year 2021 and since then, it is pending before the trial court.
7. In the aforesaid circumstances, this application is finally
disposed of with direction to the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Court No.31, Sultanpur to dispose of Criminal Case No.615 of 2021 (new No.2570/2024 (Dilip Singh Versus Rajendra Kumar @ Rajendra Kumar Sahu), expeditiously.
Order Date :- 5.6.2025 Salim Digitally signed by :- SALIM PRAVEJ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench