Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144839 (ALL)

KADEERUL @ KADEERUN NISHA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO

BAIL/5215/2025 · 2025-06-11

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35291 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5215 of 2025 Applicant :- Kadeerul @ Kadeerun Nisha Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Nikhil Singh, learned A.G.A for the State of U.P. and perused the record. 2. The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.83 of 2025, under Sections 80(2), 85, 352, 351(3) BNS and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station - Kaisarganj, District - Bahraich, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the case and he is in jail since 7.4.2025. He further submits that marriage of son of the applicant was solemnized with daughter of the informant and quarrel was taken place, as a result, incident in question was taken place and daughter of the informant died. He further submits that F.I.R. of the case in question was lodged on exaggerated facts dragging all the in-laws. He also submits that applicant is aged about 52 years and she is ready to cooperate in the investigation. He further submits that applicant will not involve in any illegal activities in the future. In these circumstances, the applicant is entitled for bail. In case of being enlarged on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of bail and submits that sufficient evidences were found against the applicant, but he does not dispute this fact that basically quarrel was taken place in between the deceased and her husband. 5. Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A., material available on record, contents of F.I.R., other relevant documents, nature of offence as well as facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 6. Let applicant - Kadeerul @ Kadeerun Nisha - be released on bail in aforesaid Case Crime, on her furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not commit or participate in any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which she is suspected. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that she shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iv) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or through her counsel. In case of her absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against her under Section 229-A IPC. (v) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure her presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against her, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A IPC. (vi) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against her in accordance with law. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 11.6.2025 GauraV/- Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench