Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144828 (ALL)

RAJENDRA @ RAJENDRA PRASAD PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE SECTT. LKO AND 19 OTHERS

A227/4009/2025 · 2025-07-08

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38717 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4009 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajendra @ Rajendra Prasad Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Sectt. Lko And 19 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and also Sri Mohan Singh for the Village Panchayat. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition under Article 226 has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to opposite party No.2 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Mandal, District Ayodhya to decide case No.2631 of 2023, computerized case No.C202304000002631 (Rajendra @ Rajendra Prasad Pandey and others Vs. Pankaj Kumar and others), under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing counsel has no objection, if direction is issued for expeditious disposal of the revision. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Mandal, District Ayodhya, is directed to decide case No.2631 of 2023, computerized case No.C202304000002631 (Rajendra @ Rajendra Prasad Pandey and others Vs. Pankaj Kumar and others), under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously, say within a period of eight months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 8.7.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench