Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14482 (RAJ)

SONU RATHORE S/O ROOPCHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4721/2025 · 2025-05-16

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:20707] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4721/2025 Sonu Rathore S/o Roopchand, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Peeplaaj Police Station Khanpur District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 16/05/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.234/2023 registered at Police Station-Kotwali Jhalawar, District-Jhalawar for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that the complainant-Dhum Singh, who is the Branch Manager of the concerned company, has itself presented an application before the trial Court, stating that complainant has no objection and bail may be granted to the present petitioner. He has filed an affidavit to this effect also then too, the learned District Judge has rejected [2025:RJ-JP:20707] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4721/2025] the bail on flimsy grounds. Charge-sheet has been filed. Petitioner is behind the bars since 10.03.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, especially in view of the no objection granted by the complainant as well as the affidavit filed by him but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Sonu Rathore S/o Roopchand shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/177