Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT
214
Seema
State of Punjab and others
CORAM: HON
Present :
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1.
declared pursuant t respondents No.4 and 5 stand promoted as
2.
that subsists is Professor with effect from the date on which the private respondents were promoted and one post thereof is lying vacant, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Versus State of Punjab and others
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate and Ms. Gauri Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mr. Ranjivan Singh, Advocate and Mr. Husandeep Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Mr. K.S.Dadwal, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel submits that result has declared pursuant to the last order and the petitioner as well as respondents No.4 and 5 stand promoted as Associate Professors
Learned counsel submits that the grievance of the petitioner that subsists is with regard to the promotion to th Professor with effect from the date on which the private respondents were promoted and one post thereof is lying vacant,
OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1607-2019 (O & M) Date of decision: 15.07.2025
....Petitioner
...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Advocate,
Mr. Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate and
Mr. Ranjivan Singh, Advocate and
Mr. Husandeep Singh, Advocate,
Learned State counsel submits that result has since been o the last order and the petitioner as well as Associate Professors.
Learned counsel submits that the grievance of the petitioner with regard to the promotion to the post of Assistant Professor with effect from the date on which the private respondents were promoted and one post thereof is lying vacant, regarding which she shall
PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.15 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment.
CWP-1607-2019
-2- submit a representation, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection.
3.
Disposed of. In case a representation is filed within 4 weeks, the same be decided within a further period of 3 months from its receipt, in accordance with law.
15.07.2025
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No
Whether reportable : Yes / No
PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.15 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment.