Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14482 (JK)

MST. HAJIRA AND ORS. v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE)

LPA/298/2025 · 2025-12-08

Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No.1 REGULAR CAUSE LIST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR LPA 298/2025 In OWP 632/2003 Mst. Hajra and Ors. …Appellant(s) Through: Mr. M.Y. Bhat, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sajid Ahmad, Advocate Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Mian Tufail, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 08.12.2025 1. Mr. M.Y. Bhat, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants, after arguing for a while very fairly submits that the mutation was attested in the absence of any specific decree by the Civil Court declaring the appellants as owners by adverse possession. It is submitted that the appellants have already filed a civil suit in this regard and the mutation, if any, can be attested only after a decree is passed in the said civil suit. 2. In the aforesaid background, he seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue the civil suit which is pending adjudication before the Court of learned Second Additional and District Sessions Judge, Srinagar. MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 09.12.25 3. Statement of learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants is taken on record and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE JUDGE SRINAGAR: 08.12.2025 “Mir Arif” MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 09.12.25