Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144787 (ALL)

MAHENDRA PAL SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF TRANSPORT LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/6704/2025 · 2025-05-30

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34171 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6704 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mahendra Pal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Transport Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jaikaran Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the opposite parties. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing and commanding the opposite party No.3 to decide the representation dated 14.04.2025 moved by the petitioner." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation dated 14.04.2025 (Annexure No.5) to the competent authority but to no avail. He has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e.,General Manager (Personnel) U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Lucknow and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 5. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e.,General Manager (Personnel) U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Lucknow ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 6. 6. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Reena/- (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench