Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 144781 (ALL)

AMAR NATH VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/4080/2025 · 2025-07-10

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39473 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4080 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amar Nath Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lalji Yadav,Vishnu Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to private respondents is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to respondent No.2- Naib Tehsildar Rampur, Tehsil Lalganj, District Pratapgarh to decide the Case No. 00505 of 2018 (Computerized Case No. T201802570200505) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006: Kallu Versus Mahrajdeen, pending since 2000 before the respondent No.2- Naib Tehsildar Rampur, Tehsil Lalganj, District Pratapgarh. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent No.2- Naib Tehsildar Rampur, Tehsil Lalganj, District Pratapgarh, considers and decides the aforesaid application in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.2- Naib Tehsildar Rampur, Tehsil Lalganj, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide the Case No. 00505 of 2018 (Computerized Case No. T201802570200505) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006: Kallu Versus Mahrajdeen, pending before him, after giving opportunity of hearing to all the parties, expeditiously, say, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur,J.) Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Arvind Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench